Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
12/15/07 at 4:38pm
News: Thanks for your patience while the forums were upgraded.


Pages: 1
historical question: most powerfull pecusion rifle (Read 319 times)
agent00
YaBB Newbies
*


I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5
historical question: most powerfull pecusion rifle
02/13/06 at 12:00pm
 
Hi,  I am new in this board and my first question is   already in the subject line: What was the most powefull military muzzle loading rilfe? Was there on model better than ohters when stopping/wounding power is concerned or  where all rilfes equal in power?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Bill_Curtis
Full Member





Posts: 137
Re: historical question: most powerfull pecusion r
Reply #1 - 02/13/06 at 2:12pm
 
For a start, how about the Heavy Naval Brunswick Model of 1840 made at Enfield by Lovell.  Calibre .796.  Production was limited to 100 examples as it proved to be rather a useless confection which incorporated the obsolete idea that the only way to increase range was to have a bigger ball without realising that elongating from a round ball gave the necessary weight with improved ballistic efficiency.  This was, of course, the dawn of the Mini� age with people like Delvigne reaching towards the huge improvements of the 1850s.
 
Given the constant changes going on throughout the period it can only be realistic to select a given date and then to make the comparisons, so the latter part of your question must remain unanswered.  Power in a rifle/musket is also a factor of the combination of range, accuracy and striking force.
Back to top
 
 

Bill Curtis
  IP Logged
agent00
YaBB Newbies
*


I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5
Re: historical question: most powerfull pecusion r
Reply #2 - 02/13/06 at 7:25pm
 
ok thx for your answer. @ Bill Curtis Have you got the ballistic data of the Heavy Naval Brunswick ?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
dbm
Full Member



Long Range Muzzle
Loader -
www.lrml.org

Posts: 101
Re: historical question: most powerfull pecusion r
Reply #3 - 02/13/06 at 8:56pm
 
I've noticed similar posting on this topic on other forums. Has there been a concensus of opinion reached amongst you correspondents, or is there a top five! Smiley
 
David
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 02/14/06 at 5:18pm by dbm »  

David Minshall
  IP Logged
Bill_Curtis
Full Member





Posts: 137
Re: historical question: most powerfull pecusion r
Reply #4 - 02/14/06 at 1:01am
 
The Heavy Navy took a belted ball suitable to the calibre with an initial loading of 3.5 drams of powder (96 grains) which was later reduced to 2.5 drams (70 grains) the standard rifle load.  In other words, a large ball travelling rather slowly.  As it was never used in action, any discussion on this rather useless object is not very relevant.  I used to own one for very many years and had a mould constructed on the Ordnance records specification.  I found that with both the original loads it would not hold a six feet square target at 200 yards.  I suppose one could have landed a ball somewhere on a three-decker at the estimated maximum sight setting of 470 yards, but to plonk a mid-19th century Nelson successor, well, perhaps, if you were above the victim and dropped the thing on him.
Back to top
 
 

Bill Curtis
  IP Logged
agent00
YaBB Newbies
*


I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5
Re: historical question: most powerfull pecusion r
Reply #5 - 02/14/06 at 10:54am
 
@Bill thx again for your infos.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1